Online fan sentiment · Michael Carrick · July–October 2026
VERDICT

Online sentiment has turned clearly against Carrick

63–73%
critical, every week since 21 Sep
up from 14–41% a week in July–August (share of items taking a clear stance)
149
items calling to sack him or naming a successor
the No. 1 critical argument, 8× its supportive count (18)
15,386
X posts in 7 days, 7–13 Oct
6,655 on 10 Oct alone, the day of the 1-1 v Spurs
Turning point: the mood shifted in the week starting 14 Sep, after 0-1 v City (13 Sep) and 2-3 v Brighton in the Carabao Cup (16 Sep). First week above 50% critical: from 21 Sep (73%).

01What we analysed

Items kept per platform after cleaning. Bars show each platform's split: critical, neutral, supportive.

X logo

X

476
posts analysed
13 Jul – 13 Oct

English-language posts, no reposts

23% critical · 30% supportive
Reddit logo

Reddit

656
posts & comments analysed
24 Jul – 13 Oct

r/reddevils

14% critical · 8% supportive
YouTube logo

YouTube

928
comments analysed
14 Aug – 13 Oct

Comments on 27 United & Carrick videos

14% critical · 9% supportive
Google Trends logo

Google Trends

3
search series
past 3 months, daily

“Michael Carrick” UK + worldwide, “Carrick sacked” UK

2,060
items analysed
of 3,749 collected. The rest were removed: outside the study period, duplicates, deleted, empty or bot posts, media and large accounts, and very high-volume accounts.

02How the mood shifted

Weekly share critical vs supportive (of items taking a clear stance), with United results. Hover for details.

Weeks run Monday–Sunday. Grey bars: all items analysed that week, including neutral. The final week (from 12 Oct) covers only 12–13 October.
×2.6volume in the week starting 14 Sep: 267 items, up from 103
73%critical in the week starting 21 Sep, the first week above 50%
73%critical again in the week of the 1-1 v Spurs (from 5 Oct)

03What fans argue about

Items mentioning each theme, in critical vs supportive items.

Keyword-based themes; an item can carry several. Successor talk is dominated by Antonio Conte. Supportive voices mostly blame the owners, recruitment and players, and point to last season’s third-place finish.

04Attention is spiking

Daily X posts mentioning Carrick with United, and Google search interest.

Posts mentioning Carrick with United / MUFC / Man Utd, reposts excluded. Daily counts, UTC. 13 Oct partial.
Index values, not search counts: 100 = peak for that term and region.

05In their words

Anonymised.

“Carrick completely lost it. Seriously out of his depth.”
Critical · YouTube · 12 Oct
“I back Carrick, don’t get me wrong, but I think we made the wrong decision giving him the job full time.”
Ambivalent · X · 9 Oct
“I have a gut feeling that we are getting back to the glory days with Carrick.”
Supportive · YouTube · mid-Sep

06Method & caveats

Platforms, period and items
PlatformWhatPeriodAnalysed
XEnglish-language posts, no reposts13 Jul – 13 Oct476
Redditr/reddevils posts and comments24 Jul – 13 Oct656
YouTubeComments on 27 United & Carrick videos14 Aug – 13 Oct928
Google Trends“Michael Carrick” (UK, worldwide), “Carrick sacked” (UK)past 3 months3 series
Total3,749 items collected13 Jul – 13 Oct 20262,060

Each item was labelled critical, supportive or neutral towards Carrick. Weekly shares count only items taking a clear stance. Themes are keyword-based, and one item can carry several.

Caveats

  • This is online sentiment among people who post. It is not a representative poll of Manchester United fans.
  • Labels are automatic and checked by hand on a subset. Treat trends as directional, not exact.
  • Reddit covers r/reddevils only. YouTube comment dates are approximate.
  • Match results are taken from public match coverage at the time of analysis.
  • Google Trends values are relative (100 = peak per term and region), not search counts. No “Carrick out” series is included.